No doubt Prince Charles' shoes in the smaller photo may well be over 40 years old. But was he really wearing the same pair in 1968?
On closer inspection, these look like a pair of derbies, unlike the pair of oxfords he wear in 2009.
Prince Charles: same shoes?
Such shoes, with care, can last a lifetime. Moreover, if they are worn reasonably frequently, they do adapt to slight changes in the feet, as we age. Dangers against longevity are: damp and mould; central heating; over-use; failing to to go for repair by the maker in time - and angry women.
NJS
NJS
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:59 pm
- Contact:
I'm not sure the attribution of the garish shoes pictured is correct. Say what you will about The Man Who Will Be King, Charles has never had a penchant for uglyass shoes such as these. The closest he came is when Diana thought his footwear was far too stodgy and steered him toward trendy readymades at Trickers. Ladies, never get between a man and his bootmaker! John Lobb of St. James has shod the famous and the not so famous, usually in impreccable taste and a style that remains forever a classic. Whether in his twenties or his early sixties, I can't imagine Prince Charles tucking his toes into these two-texture nightmares.
JMB
JMB
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:16 pm
- Contact:
Our fellow member Will covered this topic not too long ago on his blog.
http://asuitablewardrobe.dynend.com/200 ... shoes.html
Best Regards,
Cufflink79
http://asuitablewardrobe.dynend.com/200 ... shoes.html
Best Regards,
Cufflink79
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:15 pm
- Contact:
I don’t think they are the identical shoes. The ‘68 pair looks like ‘V-Fronts’ - three eyelets derbies (bluchers), while the ‘09 shoes are oxfords (balmorals).
Here are a few more samples of HRH’s shoes:
I think the problem is a military polishing technique: put on a thick layer of wax, then use a blow-torch and melt it all.
I believe John Lobb has a lifelong care and valet service for it’s shoes. It might be a good idea to fill a big bag with shoes and send one of the footmen over to JL. (Only a few minutes walk from Clarence House.)
Here are a few more samples of HRH’s shoes:
I think the problem is a military polishing technique: put on a thick layer of wax, then use a blow-torch and melt it all.
I believe John Lobb has a lifelong care and valet service for it’s shoes. It might be a good idea to fill a big bag with shoes and send one of the footmen over to JL. (Only a few minutes walk from Clarence House.)
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:59 pm
- Contact:
Bengal-Stripe:
The military polishing technique you describe may explain the derivation of holding your feet to the fire. Torching these tatty old lace-ups
seems an appropriate end. Shoes wear out, that's all there is to that. The structure of your feet changes as you age, so commission a new pair.
JMB
The military polishing technique you describe may explain the derivation of holding your feet to the fire. Torching these tatty old lace-ups
seems an appropriate end. Shoes wear out, that's all there is to that. The structure of your feet changes as you age, so commission a new pair.
JMB
Well, I am not sure I completely agree.
I realise I have a pair of Church brown brogues which to the best of my knowledge I purchased from the factory shop (I believe they were seconds) in about 1983. I tend to wear them at weekends. Twenty six years on, they still have their original sole and are as supremely comfortable now as they were when purchased.
Chelsea
I realise I have a pair of Church brown brogues which to the best of my knowledge I purchased from the factory shop (I believe they were seconds) in about 1983. I tend to wear them at weekends. Twenty six years on, they still have their original sole and are as supremely comfortable now as they were when purchased.
Chelsea
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests