Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:02 pm
There were a few bits of critical feedback recently on another thread from several members regarding the content quality. The common themes appear to be 1) they seem to have fallen into a set formula that gives the impression of repetitiveness rather than freshness; 2) they feature too many commercial, designer things and not enough bespoke and artisanal products; and 3) their prose and editing are not exactly inspiring.
As some have mentioned, I find the subscription cost a little too high. Therefore, I have not purchased any issues after the first two, which, in the interest of disclosure, were gratis (and greatly appreciated) and have not had alternative access to subsequent issues. As such, I cannot comment on the first criticism.
On the matter of price, I know that the retail price for most periodicals in most countries do not even cover the cost of material, production and distribution. With The Rake's larger format, heavier stock and four colour printing, the production and distribution costs must be relatively high in the absolute and extravagant in proportion to the advertising revenue that a title of small circulation can achieve in its first years.
The second criticism is probably spot on, but I am not sure if there is a commercially viable alternative. It will need to appeal to a broad enough audience to make it not only commercially viable but also to make it a worthwhile investment for its investor(s). Even with a (relatively) broad designer-tat-to-proper-bespoke content, the title still serves only a niche as the number of potential readers is, even on a global scale, relatively limited. I think the graveyard for magazine titles is littered with failed attempts at offering contents dealing with only the best. Those of us grey enough might remember, with some nostalgia, an American title, Connoisseur. Arguably, they were the shining star of the English language periodicals covering refined products and living. However, their demise might be characterised as being a victim of their own success. Similarly, I have no idea how FMR have managed to survive for so long in delivering high calibre multilingual content. It might be argued that FMR serves as a marketing medium for the beautiful books that Franco Maria Ricci publish and which I suspect are pure labour of love rather than a commercially sensible undertaking.
I have wondered where the equilibrium lies but cannot even begin to guess where that might be. What I do know is that if they focussed their content to target only the likes of LL members, they will not achieve the requisite scale / circulation to survive beyond just a few issues. The only market in which such periodicals can and do survive is Japan where people have a voracious appetite for printed words, no matter how niche the subject matter may seem. But then, it would have to be in Japanese...
The third criticism is, whilst I agree, not a deal breaker. However, I do agree that it does tend to exasperate the frustration arising from the first two reasons.
I think that it is, both in abstract and in practice, a very difficult balancing act (and wish that I had some constructive and actionable feedback to offer). Therefore, I do commend the publisher for having the bollocks to even try and for the staff and contributors to put it all together. No small feat. I wish them all the best.
s