catwalk report on Kilgour ready to wear collection in Milan

"The brute covers himself, the rich man and the fop adorn themselves, the elegant man dresses!"

-Honore de Balzac

Post Reply
WF
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:35 am
Contact:

Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:06 am

http://www.vogue.co.uk/fashion/show.asp ... rt/id,6423

full-length photos are also available on Vogue - click on the 'full length' tab
Bishop of Briggs
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:02 pm
Contact:

Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:28 am

Those are just the typical slim fashion styles that so many "designers are offering. Black and white just shows a lack of imagination and true sense of style. Brandelli is slowly killing off the old firm and turning it into another Italian fashion brand like Prada and Dolce & Gabbana.
storeynicholas

Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:12 pm

And so another Great bites the dust and is gathered up to such as the Mermaid Tavern, A Sulka and Sullivan Powell's Oriental cigarettes....
NJS :cry:
Bishop of Briggs
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:02 pm
Contact:

Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:30 pm

There seems to be a current trend in buying up established British brands and trying to target the youth market. Pringle and Lyle & Scott are two recent examples. There may be short-term gain but probably long-term pain in such fickle markets.

Gieves & Hawkes is trying to claw back its mature customers who were repelled by the Gieves youth brand. I would guess that Kilgour's older bespoke customers, disgusted by Brandelli's imported Eurotrash staff, are defecting to other traditional houses on the Row.
storeynicholas

Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:51 pm

All the best cutters, whatever their genetic roots, really need to be born within the sound of Bow Bells and pronounce 'half' as 'art' (as in 'art a crahn) and balcony as 'bralcony' and call a suit a 'whistle' - otherwise it is pointless putting chalk and shears to cloth.
NJS
rjman
Posts: 494
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:15 pm
Location: lost in the #steez force
Contact:

Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:34 pm

Bishop of Briggs wrote:There seems to be a current trend in buying up established British brands and trying to target the youth market. Pringle and Lyle & Scott are two recent examples. There may be short-term gain but probably long-term pain in such fickle markets.

Gieves & Hawkes is trying to claw back its mature customers who were repelled by the Gieves youth brand. I would guess that Kilgour's older bespoke customers, disgusted by Brandelli's imported Eurotrash staff, are defecting to other traditional houses on the Row.
Ballantyne, Drumohr, McGeorge, Chester Barrie, etc., etc., etc.

Gieves has been showing on the catwalk for a while. Even 25 years ago Flusser was able to write that G&H was no longer doing much bespoke tailoring relative to its RTW business. Gieves and Kilgour are using a high-profile RTW to gain the attention of customers who wouldn't have thought of using them, customers who may, sooner or later, buy its bespoke as well. It's something that the so-called New Savile Row did. Both Gieves and Kilgour had significant RTW operations prior to their relaunch as fashion brands; Kilgour's in particular was diluted by a North American license that had very little to do with its style or quality. I prefer its current incarnation to that which was looking for a direction in the 1990s. While I don't agree with much of what Brandelli does or says, he's successfully made Kilgour contemporary while also retaining the traditional bespoke for those who can afford it, even if more attention is focused on their Chinese-made "Entry-Level Bespoke", which is by most accounts a good product.
K-tie
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:50 am
Contact:

Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:41 pm

I once considered G&H for my next suit in order to experiment a more modern look. Now I know better. Thanks.
storeynicholas

Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:36 pm

What is tremendously sad about the G & H decline is that they designed and built the naval and military uniforms which the whole world then copied with adaptations - as well as having claims to Nelson, David Livingstone (and Stanley) and many other great men.
:cry:
NJS
sartorius
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:32 am
Location: London
Contact:

Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:28 am

What is tremendously sad about the G & H decline is that they designed and built the naval and military uniforms which the whole world then copied with adaptations - as well as having claims to Nelson, David Livingstone (and Stanley) and many other great men.
Gents, whilst I am not here to act as advocat for the defence for G&H, I have to say that we are in danger of sounding like a bunch of grumpy old men! The G&H bespoke operation is in my experience excellent. The quality of their product, the speed they produce it and the level of their after sales care are outstanding. If you don't like their RTW line (and I don't), then don't buy it. But don't conflate their RTW with their bespoke - they are different operations with different customers and different business models.
storeynicholas

Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:41 am

When you say 'conflate' do you mean 'confuse'? Encouraging to see that G&H have some support still. And - well, yes, I am quite old and VERY GRUMPY. if there were more grumpy old men of our generation, maybe there would not have been 17 (or with the frantic stabbings of the French students in New Cross is it now 19) fatal stabbings of youngsters in London this year. Hazy, lazy laid-back slackers make for a miserable society. Time to wake up, perhaps. :shock:
NJS
sartorius
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:32 am
Location: London
Contact:

Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:00 pm

When you say 'conflate' do you mean 'confuse'?
I think that we should accept that SR businesses are like businesses everywhere. No business can survive unless it adapts and, for tailoring, that seems to have meant broadening the customer base by exploiting the brand. I agree with many others here that for some tailors brand exploitation has been difficult and has not always worked. But the proof of the theory is that most of those which have diversified are still in business and the fundamental consequence of remaining in business is that they are still able to offer the bespoke product which they have offered for 100 years+.

My own experience is with G&H and I know that their bespoke operation is separate from the RTW business. Many of the tailors will tell you that they don't like the RTW side of the company either, but they do recognise that the two exist in symbiosis.
Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests