Yikes, sounds like the rot of marketeering at work here, leveraging a brand and such-like. But why risk devaluing your product by knowingly licensing your name to an inferior make? Quite odd.Melcombe wrote: I had some reservations on unwrapping it, but after laundering it, my worst fears were proven. The poor stitching has (along with the linings in the collar and placket) shrunk differentially to the (poor) fabric of the shirt itself. It is a sorry excuse for a garment.
Another thing I might raise is the craze for ''stitches per inch'': in all my time wearing shirts of all marks and makes, I've never had a seam give out on me. In all cases the cloth itself has worn away before a stitch has come loose. So perhaps we could cast a cold eye on that indicator?
And for those with their finger on the pulse of London's shirtmakers, England Expects.....!