A Sartorial Crime?

"The brute covers himself, the rich man and the fop adorn themselves, the elegant man dresses!"

-Honore de Balzac

Tucker Peterson

Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:11 pm

In his book The Englishman's Suit, Hardy Amies denounces the use of peaked lapels (what he calls "double breasted revers") on a single breasted suit as "a sartorial crime".

I wondered if this was truly the case? I believe I remember seeing pictures of Mr. Anthony Eden in such an outfit. Is Amies merely opining his taste, or is it just not done? I'm still trying to piece together a sound knowledge of the unwritten, unspoken "Rules", so forgive my ignorance.

Tucker
User avatar
culverwood
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:56 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:29 pm

I would agree with Hardy Amies that it is a "fashion" and not a classic style but I am sure Sator will have many pictures to prove me wrong.
storeynicholas

Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:38 pm

On single-breasted dinner jackets DB lapels are classic. On a SB lounge suit, they are unusual but hardly a crime - they are not my preference but that is just choice.
NJS
Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:57 am

I can give two examples where pointed lapels or double breasted lapels (to use the British English terms) are pretty much standard with a single breasted coat: the dress lounge (nowadays called the dinner jacket), and the morning coat. The dinner jacket is just another type of lounge coat. If lounge coats in general cannot take pointed lapels then dinner jackets can't take them either.

BTW this comes from Whife, London, 1951 (section written by Phillip Dellafera):

Image

It comes from the women's section but he also writes the men's section.

http://www.cutterandtailor.com/forum
Last edited by Sator on Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NCW
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 8:00 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:58 am

Amies does make some slightly controversial statements at times, for example his insistence that we blow our noses on our pocket squares (or rather, put our handkerchiefs in our breast pockets, and not use pocket squares), while I am sure the habit of 'one for show, one for blow' is reasonably widespread among loungers.

This could be another such comment, based on his (very good) sense of style, but which does not align totally with standard opinion.
Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:03 pm

Tucker Peterson wrote:In his book The Englishman's Suit, Hardy Amies denounces the use of peaked lapels (what he calls "double breasted revers") on a single breasted suit as "a sartorial crime".
BTW I don't own the book, but does he really talk about 'single breasted suits'? What a dreadfully vague expression as it is unclear what type of suit he means. Some authors do talk about dinner suits for example - yes, there is historic precedent to that! I hope he meant either all lounge coats, only lounge coats as part of a lounge suit, or all single breasted coats in general. Or does he permit pointed lapels on lounge coats provided they are not part of a suit eg sports coats???

If he indeed did mean coats in general, then I would also add that single breasted frock coats commonly took pointed lapels.
Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:47 pm

Prince Charles in a "single breasted suit" with double breasted lapels:

Image

http://www.cutterandtailor.com/forum
Last edited by Sator on Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
culverwood
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:56 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:02 pm

I have no doubt he was referring to lounge suits.
Image
Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:42 pm

My point is this. All of these single breasted coats may correctly take pointed lapels:

-SB frock coats
-Morning coats
-Dress lounge coats (dinner jackets)

Why is the lounge coat exempt? - the fact that a dinner jacket is a type of lounge coat anyway not withstanding.

The answer may be because a lounge suit is too informal a garment to correctly take pointed lapels, unlike the other listed garments. I certainly agree that the lounge coat in its iteration as a sports coat is too informal to take pointed lapels. However, that does not appear to be his line of argument.

The fact is that even cutters from the 1900's say that their customers that used to order frock coats from them were now ordering lounge coats. The lounge coat has a comparable level of dressiness to the frock coat in its day. For better or for worse, I think that makes the lounge a sufficiently dressy a garment to be able to correctly take pointed lapels.

Nonetheless, I will concede that I prefer that a single breasted pointed lapel lounge coat be part of something a little more formal. I like to wear them with cashmere striped trousers for example. Here is a recent example of mine:

Image

Image

Image

I am much less keen on two and three button lounges with pointed lapels. It think that the same principle should be applied to the lounge as to the morning coat. When the coat has two to three buttons it should take a step lapel, but with the one button model it should take a pointed lapel.

Image

Needless to say the dinner jacket is a one button lounge coat.

http://www.cutterandtailor.com/forum
Last edited by Sator on Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tucker Peterson

Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:03 pm

The words "A Sartorial Crime" in his book appear in a caption writ beneath an advert for a single-breasted lounge suit offered by an embryonic MTM firm (one could select the fabric, and they would measure, and then a factory of tailors would be turned loose upon one's order. At, if I read English monetary notation correctly, 45 shillings per suit.

Tucker
storeynicholas

Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:38 pm

Tucker Peterson wrote:The words "A Sartorial Crime" in his book appear in a caption writ beneath an advert for a single-breasted lounge suit offered by an embryonic MTM firm (one could select the fabric, and they would measure, and then a factory of tailors would be turned loose upon one's order. At, if I read English monetary notation correctly, 45 shillings per suit.

Tucker
They generally used to be called 'Fifty Shilling Tailors' and, probably, Hardy Amies regarded them as bog-brush end of the market.
NJS
schneidergott
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: Castle Douglas, Scotland

Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:31 pm

Here is an example of a lounge coat or "Sakko" with peak lapels:

Image
By schneidergott, shot with 5MP-9X9 at 2007-12-18

Looks good to me. Here is another one from 1934:

Image
By schneidergott at 2008-10-09


SG
storeynicholas

Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:40 pm

The DB lapel on a SB town lounge suit coat works for me with 1 or 2 buttons but not so much with 3 - looks a little dated, maybe? It possibly wouldn't go on checked tweeds easily either.
NJS
Cufflink79
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:16 pm
Contact:

Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:33 am

Single breasted peaked lapels are great on suits and dinner jackets. I have even seen a few odd jackets that look good with that style as well.

Notch lapels are for single breasted suits, sportcoats, and blazers only. NEVER on a dinner jacket. :wink:

Notch lapels should NEVER EVER be on double breasted jackets either.

Best Regards,

Cufflink79
storeynicholas

Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:46 am

Cufflink79 wrote:Single breasted peaked lapels are great on suits and dinner jackets. I have even seen a few odd jackets that look good with that style as well.

Notch lapels are for single breasted suits, sportcoats, and blazers only. NEVER on a dinner jacket. :wink:

Notch lapels should NEVER EVER be on double breasted jackets either.

Best Regards,

Cufflink79
Good summary.
NJS
Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests