I still like them but now want a fully customised non-wholecut in shell.
Your advice regarding the type of the shoe would be greatly appreciated, as would be some inspiring pictures
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Merc, thank you for your input. I also have somewhat mixed feeling about (full) brogues, that's why I tend towards half-brogues.Merc wrote: as for style--really its personal choice--i for one am not crazy about full brogues, i like a simpler shoe--but many men are big advocates of them
as for truly formal-- all that patterning may look out of place with a tuxedo-but then again--black would be a better choice than #8 anyway for formal
of course if by formal you simply but that color can be very good with certain color suits -i particularly like it with grays
Thanks for giving me food for thought again, Hectormhectorm wrote:Hello again Kamil,
I guess that since you already own a pair of shell cordovan shoes and you are considering to have a second pair made, there is nothing I can say to make you change your mind. But I´ll try (as an owner of 3 pairs of Alden SC bought last century and still in use).
I do not think that shell cordovan is the most desirable hide for a pair of elegant dress oxfords. They are durable and flexible yes (which could be ideal for a pair of plain chukka boots with rubber sole) but IMHO they do not age well in terms of creases and patina. The creases in the horse leather -which could be very deep- acquire a lighter whitish tone (instead of the darker tone of the shallow creases in cow hide). I do not think that this is elegant and all the buffing in the world would not get rid of it. Also shell cordovan shoes do not take polishing or waxing that well (they are very waxy to begin with) so the patina that you would get on good cow hide shoes is never achieved.
No 8 color from Horween is definitely darker than the Bordeaux from Carmina shown in the picture (BTW, your pair of whole cuts looked great when new).
Also, you might know this already, you will need two pieces (two shells) of cordovan for one pair of shoes.
Agreed that shells are not ideal for dressy oxfords, but I think shells age well and can make a pair of oxfords more casual looking, which is not necessarily a bad thing. It just depends on what the OP is trying to achieve. In my experience, one largest or second largest shell is enough to make a pair of shoes in most designs (I have supplied my shoemaker with shell colors he can't obtain).hectorm wrote:Hello again Kamil,
I guess that since you already own a pair of shell cordovan shoes and you are considering to have a second pair made, there is nothing I can say to make you change your mind. But I´ll try (as an owner of 3 pairs of Alden SC bought last century and still in use).
I do not think that shell cordovan is the most desirable hide for a pair of elegant dress oxfords. They are durable and flexible yes (which could be ideal for a pair of plain chukka boots with rubber sole) but IMHO they do not age well in terms of creases and patina. The creases in the horse leather -which could be very deep- acquire a lighter whitish tone (instead of the darker tone of the shallow creases in cow hide). I do not think that this is elegant and all the buffing in the world would not get rid of it. Also shell cordovan shoes do not take polishing or waxing that well (they are very waxy to begin with) so the patina that you would get on good cow hide shoes is never achieved.
No 8 color from Horween is definitely darker than the Bordeaux from Carmina shown in the picture (BTW, your pair of whole cuts looked great when new).
Also, you might know this already, you will need two pieces (two shells) of cordovan for one pair of shoes.
Agreed. Congratulations.Concordia wrote:Probably the nicest-looking Adelaides I've ever seen. Enjoy!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest