Stylish, elegant, tasteful or bland?

"He had that supreme elegance of being, quite simply, what he was."

-C. Albaret describing Marcel Proust

Style, chic, presence, sex appeal: whatever you call it, you can discuss it here.
Scot
Posts: 568
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 8:44 pm
Contact:

Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:48 pm

Where does the top button (& button hole) on a 3 rolled to 2.5 (or, worse, 2) come into the simplicity equation? Somewhat akin to the ticket pocket I think. :D
alden
Posts: 8206
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:58 am
Contact:

Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:58 pm

When you have really mastered simplicity, you probably have been through everything else before :wink:
Very nicely said.

Rendering complex dressing statements in an easy, succinct and seemingly effortless manner is one of the true tests of style.

Michael Alden
Costi
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:21 pm

Degas or Utamaro?
Image
Image

Renoir or Hokusai?
Image
Image

Delacroix or Utamaro?
Image
Image

Brueghel or Hokusai?
Image
Image
Costi
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:31 pm

Some more Brueghel maximalism...
Image
Image

And some minimalist but meaningful Ikebana:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

(there should be only ONE of these, but I have a hard time choosing...)

Take your pick! :wink:
Costi
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Tue Mar 22, 2011 5:59 pm

Scot wrote:Where does the top button (& button hole) on a 3 rolled to 2.5 (or, worse, 2) come into the simplicity equation? Somewhat akin to the ticket pocket I think. :D
It is a "zero" factor: when done well (so as to look like the lapels naturally unrolled with time and wear through the top button(hole) and towards the middle button, rather than as an afterthought on a straight 2B coat), it may enhance the charm of the coat; but it certainly doesn't generate Style where there isn't any...
Gruto

Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:59 pm

Costi wrote:Take your pick! :wink:
Image
Why not have both :twisted:
Costi
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Tue Mar 22, 2011 9:44 pm

Gruto wrote:Why not have both :twisted:
Image
ccox
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 2:09 pm
Location: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Contact:

Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:46 pm

I doubt that I can add much to the conversation that hasn't already been written, but I will point out that Cary Grant dressed as he did to draw all attention to that tanned and handsome mug of his. There was no color or pattern to distract from the column that lead directly to his face.
Costi
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:52 pm

ccox wrote:I doubt that I can add much to the conversation that hasn't already been written
Ccox, you have just written down the essential truth of this whole thread.
However, some of us may want to use dress to distract the eye from what Nature gave us :wink: But even in that case, I am not sure this is the best attitude :?
Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests