![Image](http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/2073/liushoe1.jpg)
![Image](http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/7707/liushoe2.jpg)
Please share you views with me.
Cheers,
It seems that you are in the minority. Steven Hitchcock has a pair from Paul Davies - http://savilerow.blogs.com/.shared/imag ... hoes_5.JPG and http://savilerow.blogs.com/.shared/imag ... /shoes.JPG.Jordan Marc wrote:ay329:
Imitation lacing on a side-gusseted slip-on brogue makes no sense. It has no purpose, other than faux decoration, and doesn't enhance the design. The beauty of the shoe is all that meticulous punching and pinking along the cap and the rear quarters, the leather- or suede-covered gussets, and even more punching that arches gracefully up the vamp and continues along the top line of the side quarters. It's truly a tour de force and attests to the skills of the closers at Cleverly, G&G and Suzuki. When a style of shoe is this beautiful and comfortable to wear, it needs nothing else other than handmade trees and good care.
JMB
I have to agree. I can't help thinking that they look like fish gills.BespokeMex wrote:I'm sorry, but there is something fundamentally wrong about this type of shoes. I just don't like the style or the idea of it.
I disagree, surely a brogue shoe is informal and the most formal side gusseted shoe is without decoration like the ones below but in black if you must.ay329 wrote:Nothing completes a lazyman shoe like faux lacing.
For those who strive for the comfort of a side gussetted shoe, but prefer the shoe to appear more formal, imitation lacing is a MUST
You can either embrace them (as some of the designs above seem to) or hide them. I favor the latter approach. If you get only one set of gills per shoe, on the inside (keeping the outside edge clean), it looks much more like a normal pair of Oxfords.A.Hacking wrote:I have to agree. I can't help thinking that they look like fish gills.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests