Turning Corners

"The brute covers himself, the rich man and the fop adorn themselves, the elegant man dresses!"

-Honore de Balzac

Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:46 am

manton wrote:
One example: I used to hate square end knit ties.

One more example. I have always despised bluchers with a suit (except monks, not sure why the exception, but there we are.

This picture began to change my mind:

Image
I must say I have had a chance to think this post through a little of late. My feeling is that knit ties are fine, along with loafers and derbies with lounge suits.

The thing is that the lounge suit - like all garments - comes in a wide range of different levels of formality. I think it is very important to remember their origins as out-and-out casual wear for beach and countryside. The Duke of Windsor is clearly wearing his pair of derbies at home - his attire is purely casual. Lounge suits are indeed for lounging around in. In his time memories of the true origins of the lounge were clearly more in people's minds. In fact, the lounge suit in the workplace was really a form of business casual in his day.

Like the lounge suit, ties too come in a range of different levels of formality. I love to wear knit ties in the summer with linen and cotton coats. I like the way they look more relaxed and casual.

However, just as I despise POW checks being worn as city wear, I equally frown upon derbies, loafers and knit ties being worn "in the city". That, I call slobwear. At least wearers of t-shirts and jeans have no such false pretensions about being properly dressed.
Last edited by Sator on Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cordovan
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:14 pm

Sator,

While I may not have cultivated the same degree of sartorial taste as you, I definitely appreciate your post. I particularly like the way you traced the lounge suit to its origin to determine what properly goes with it.

Cordovan
HappyStroller
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:29 pm
Contact:

Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:53 am

I'd be persuaded too, Sir, what with those 2 friendly-looking mascots beside the PoW.
manton wrote: One more example. I have always despised bluchers with a suit (except monks, not sure why the exception, but there we are.

This picture began to change my mind:

Image

I saw it many times, over many years, before it had any effect on me. Then about two years ago, suddently it started to creep into my head. I still didn't change my habits, but I started thinking about it.
Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests