smoothjazzone wrote:I would gladly move to Vienna permanently if I could find something to do there!
But, Smoothjazzone, there's no Vincent Nicolosi, Tip Top, and Alex Kabbazz in Vienna!
smoothjazzone wrote:I would gladly move to Vienna permanently if I could find something to do there!
And that may just be a good thing!!!Mark Seitelman wrote:smoothjazzone wrote:I would gladly move to Vienna permanently if I could find something to do there!
But, Smoothjazzone, there's no Vincent Nicolosi, Tip Top, and Alex Kabbazz in Vienna!
Degendorff wrote:Very nice report of a beautiful city, smoothjazzone.
Grinzing with its old houses and narrow winding streets is indeed charming during this time of the year.smoothjazzone wrote:... walk among the vineyards and then afterwards grab a simple and pleasant meal at one of the many heurigen . . .
I’m afraid, I’ll have to pour a bit of water onto that passionate feature. I do not believe that a “perfect” fit of shoes is possible. There might be a perfect fit for you, but how can a new tailor, shirt maker or shoemaker get it right first time, without knowing all your preferences. (Quite often you do not know them yourselves, only when you wear something you know what you like and what you don’t like.)smoothjazzone wrote:According to Balint -- 99/100 shoes fit perfectly the first time and even for their Viennese clients, they have not typically needed tweaks to the shoes or the last. The 1/100 times their is an issue, they are able to make minor corrections.
There are many variables what makes something comfortable for you. Shoes have the additional disadvantage, they get mould to your feet and you can only judge the fit after you have worn the shoes for a certain length of time. After three months, you know whether or not a particular shoe fits. I had this discussion with Markus Scheer, who said that for every foot, there is only one possible last shape. just go with your one pair of feet to six different shoemakers in various parts of the world, ordering six times the same basic shoe designs. You'll end up with six very different pairs.It’s a bit like corset making. Measurements are one thing, but a good corsetiere, will know where to squeeze, where to push, where to go easy, where to lift and where to suppress. Do not forget, the wishes of the customer have to be taken into account as well: Miss Scarlet O’Hara preferred her corsets rather on the tight side.
Everyone I know, when having a second pair of shoes made, has asked for alterations to last and pattern: sometimes extensive alterations, sometimes minor tweaks. That’s the way it should be. One day I’ll have a pair of Aubercy shoes made, and I will enjoy every minute of the fitting processes (plural).A complete pair will be made so that the client will be able to wear them daily for a month (anecdotally, it is said that these seem so beautiful and well-finished that some clients think that this is the definitive pair of shoes, and they have to be reminded to return to the workshop so that the actual shoes can be made.) There will be as many fitting sessions as the client may wish, until, after changes are made to the last, perfection is reached. This idea of a true fitting, by wearing the shoes, is becoming more and more rare, if not to say unique. It is more usual that just one shoe is made, and worn in the workshop for around ten minutes.
http://mesure.aubercy.com/gb/
bengal-stripe wrote:I’m afraid, I’ll have to pour a bit of water onto that passionate feature. I do not believe that a “perfect” fit of shoes is possible. There might be a perfect fit for you, but how can a new tailor, shirt maker or shoemaker get it right first time, without knowing all your preferences. (Quite often you do not know them yourselves, only when you wear something you know what you like and what you don’t like.)smoothjazzone wrote:According to Balint -- 99/100 shoes fit perfectly the first time and even for their Viennese clients, they have not typically needed tweaks to the shoes or the last. The 1/100 times their is an issue, they are able to make minor corrections.
I hope for you, that it all works out without any problems.smoothjazzone wrote:As they say, the proof is in the pudding -- and the pudding is expected to be in NY by Jan/Feb of next year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests