G&G MTO
The plain monk, Carnegie, in Polo suede:
As you can see, they have a very deep nap which responds instantly to the touch. The last is the one they call "soft square," a little sharper than EG 606, but not as angular as 888:
I really like the way they do the quarters: dramatically curved and cut away:
I also like the rather sturdy buckle they use, opposed to the somewhat cheap looking brass loop that EG uses on Troon. The finest RTW waist treatment I have ever seen:
As you can see, they have a very deep nap which responds instantly to the touch. The last is the one they call "soft square," a little sharper than EG 606, but not as angular as 888:
I really like the way they do the quarters: dramatically curved and cut away:
I also like the rather sturdy buckle they use, opposed to the somewhat cheap looking brass loop that EG uses on Troon. The finest RTW waist treatment I have ever seen:
Those are stunning shoes!
How is the fit? Do you feel that your G&G size is the same as your EG size (as Tony suggests).
Thanks.
How is the fit? Do you feel that your G&G size is the same as your EG size (as Tony suggests).
Thanks.
No. In Green, I wear 11.5 D. Tony told me that's what I should wear in G&G, too. But I tried on several fitting samples and 11 E worked better. Sadly, I ordered these before he made his fitting samples. Happily, they screwed up the size.bry2000 wrote:How is the fit? Do you feel that your G&G size is the same as your EG size (as Tony suggests)?
Can you please tell me what sole you chose?
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:26 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Contact:
The wait just got a little harder...
Great color suede.
Great color suede.
I just asked for a partial rubber covering.melia wrote:Can you please tell me what sole you chose?
Thank you, that is what i will go for on my order.
Great shoes, Manton. I must give G&G a try with some suedes. Thanks.
My derby's arrived, also in Polo suede, with the sole protectors:
The color is less "red" than the photos suggest. Very sexy shoes, and I 'm not a shoe guy, nor given to objectifying shoes.
The color is less "red" than the photos suggest. Very sexy shoes, and I 'm not a shoe guy, nor given to objectifying shoes.
both of those are very nice! it is funny that the first two G&G's pictue take happen to suade
The coloring on my shoe is much closer to Manton's than my photos suggest. I think it is my too bright flash causing some color distortion. A word about fitting on G&G:
I was not really successful in getting a good fit with EG 202 last: they measured me (with their unscrupulous surcharge) as 5 1/2 D. It was unwearable. The second iteration was in 5 E, which is better, but still very, very, snug in the width, and poorly proportioned in appearance. So uncomfortable, that I rarely wear the EG. Even a trip to London failed to bring forth a try on for sizing in EG (they are from the "trust me" or "break it in" school of salesmanship). caveat emptor
Tony had me wear the EG 5 E 202 last, when I placed my order, and felt that I should get his MTO in 5 E, with his round toe last. I must say it fits very, very, well. Decidedly different than EG's 5 E. G&G is a bit more generous in the width and shoe appears longer without any extra room felt in the toes or heel. The proportions are just beautiful, and my photos don't do the shoes justice. G&G shoe does not feel as rigid, for the lack of a better word, and for me they are very comfortable upon even the first wearing. I think this confirms the rule that if a shoe is not comfortable initially it's not likely to improve with use.
I was not really successful in getting a good fit with EG 202 last: they measured me (with their unscrupulous surcharge) as 5 1/2 D. It was unwearable. The second iteration was in 5 E, which is better, but still very, very, snug in the width, and poorly proportioned in appearance. So uncomfortable, that I rarely wear the EG. Even a trip to London failed to bring forth a try on for sizing in EG (they are from the "trust me" or "break it in" school of salesmanship). caveat emptor
Tony had me wear the EG 5 E 202 last, when I placed my order, and felt that I should get his MTO in 5 E, with his round toe last. I must say it fits very, very, well. Decidedly different than EG's 5 E. G&G is a bit more generous in the width and shoe appears longer without any extra room felt in the toes or heel. The proportions are just beautiful, and my photos don't do the shoes justice. G&G shoe does not feel as rigid, for the lack of a better word, and for me they are very comfortable upon even the first wearing. I think this confirms the rule that if a shoe is not comfortable initially it's not likely to improve with use.
How much for these beauties, in dollars? Also, why did you opt for rubber toppies instead of heal and toe taps? I remember for a while people on the forum were always trying to order steel toe taps from their shoemaker. I am not a big fan of toppies though of course, those are very, very nice.
A bit under a thousand for quality comparable to EG Top Drawer or Lobb Prestige.brescd01 wrote:How much for these beauties, in dollars? Also, why did you opt for rubber toppies instead of heal and toe taps? I remember for a while people on the forum were always trying to order steel toe taps from their shoemaker. I am not a big fan of toppies though of course, those are very, very nice.
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:26 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Contact:
Shoes go for GBP 450 ~$900Will wrote:A bit under a thousand for quality comparable to EG Top Drawer or Lobb Prestige.brescd01 wrote:How much for these beauties, in dollars? Also, why did you opt for rubber toppies instead of heal and toe taps? I remember for a while people on the forum were always trying to order steel toe taps from their shoemaker. I am not a big fan of toppies though of course, those are very, very nice.
Trees are GBP 75 ~$150
Shipping is GBP 50 ~$100
I think trees are actually 60 pounds.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests