VOL. II NO. V (June 06') Drape / Summer Suit Styles AA
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:16 am
Dear Members,
Here is the long awaited AA / Esky post full with text, diagrams and illustrations. With every post I say to my self that I am not doing something this detailed again, and yet every one of them is more detailed than the pervious ones. Obviously, this has to stop sometime if I plan to work and make a living. However, that aside this post is probably the most detailed of all the pervious ones taking a gigantic 70+ hours of work to create. It has more (summer ensembles) in it than ever before.
The text, naturally is also quite extensive and is divided into five sections which are as follows; Section 1 goes over where the lounge jackets discussion was left off last time (see Vol. II No. IV section I), this section goes over the Drape and London Lounge (British Blade) versions with diagrams and what the market was like when the first were brought over to US from west end London. Then you will go over a rare (& detailed) discussion about one of the key elements involved in cutting. i.e. Balance. Section II goes over summer fabrics details and some of the most common spots where the haute monde were spotted. Section III is a unique & detailed article about the Sports Shirts used in 1930s. Section IV is illustrations with text and finally section V is simply a beautiful (though not quite as pragmatic) article about what Savile Row was like in 20s and 30s. The best part about it, is the fact that it was written in 1937, so it is not like somebody is recalling it 7 decades later.
As always, try to not to rush through this post… for your own good. Some concepts explained are advanced but most are fairly easy to grasp with slight consideration on the part of the reader. Remember, if you see me cross referencing that is because I want you to understand how interconnected all of this stuff is. So be sure to do all the prior reading.
And… before you get a little carried away in the time zone… bear in mind the fact that seven decades have passed since most of this was written. As such you should be able to absorb the principles from here and move on in to our times. How you understand and express these principles in this day and age is going to be of paramount importance.
But before I start, I would like to thank our members Mark Seitelman, (& his associate Don) and zegnamtl for their help with scanning and editing illustrations presented in this post.
This first article is from winter 35-36 season and takes you behind the scenes of 30s apparel industry & how were they reacting to the arrival of these fascinating clothes from finest west end tailoring establishments. A BIG thanks to Manton for his help with illustartions in this section.
The New London Lounge
Why do the best dressed men in the world go to Saville Row, London, for their clothes? That is at least fifty percent a rhetorical question and, by definition, a rhetorical question one that is asked for the sake of effect. The answer to that question, if one is needed, is the same as the definition. Many of the best dressed men have their clothes tailored at Saville Row purely for the sake of effect. It is a recognized fact that clothes are cut, tailored and fitted better in America than in England.*
* Talk about changed times! Well this can be argued for the bespoke tailoring of 30s, there was certainly no doubt about this with respect to RTW clothing.
But for all that, the famous tailors of Saville Row and the West End of London put into their clothes something which is inimitably their own—a certain effect which is the vital factor that makes English clothing so much admired. This factor, incidentally, is not one that is always consciously recognized. Many of those who go to London for their clothes couldn’t tell you precisely why they select that city as tailoring center for smart dress. But nevertheless it is the effect that makes the difference, and where that effect is exaggerated or misinterpreted in any way by tailors in other sections of the globe then, obviously, it is no longer the same effect.
Perhaps nothing illustrates this point as well as the introduction of the English Drape to America several seasons ago. It was intended to achieve a certain definite effect, and was supposedly an interpretation of authentic English clothing. Patterning their clothes after the English, American tailors put a definite drape in the chest of the coat. The shoulders were made wide and square with wrinkles at the sleeve head.*
*Take note of these changes. It is of paramount importance that the original and the derived effect are differentiated and properly understood.
The waist line was pulled in, and the coat was tight about the hips. The greatest point of merit of the particular model was the fact that it inaugurated soft construction clothes in America. Unfortunately, however, many American tailors failed to get the effect they had tried so hard to achieve. The coat was exaggerated, and it didn’t bring out the right, nonchalant, smart appearance of the English custom coat after all. It showed too much of it, and the result was far from being successful. The illustration below* shows the English drape as it was introduced to America, and it also shows why manufacturers and retailers alike will admit that it was undoubtedly the hardest thing to sell. Consumers would not buy wrinkles in clothes then, and they will not buy them in clothes today.
Alright to break away for a moment and explain the much essential details which are a feature of this cut so as you are reading, you have a clear idea what they are referring to. Kindly Read last post for further details (AA/Esky Vol. II No. IV April 06’ Section I)
AA / ESKY VOL. II NO. IV
1. One of the most important aspect of the English drape jacket is the much needed natural shoulder. This can be done in a variety of ways to effect different looks. There is no correct or incorrect style here… the only incorrectness if there would be… is excessive padding. Shoulders here are in a concave like pitch and show a very slight rope effect at the end.
Before you proceed… read Manton’s great article The Neapolitan Shoulder Explained on Natural Shoulders in the featured article section… as all the necessary info is explained there in extensive detail.
2. Sleeves have a slight “puff” effect to them at the sleeve head not to mention the extra wrinkles that are caused by the excess cloth that is fed through a smaller armhole.
3 & 4. The most essential feature of the drape jacket is obviously “the drape” effect observable at chest region. In the early English drape models (as you will see through the course of this article) the drape was very obvious and well articulated. Maybe too much… and the result was that the smart dressed set… sort of back tracked and eliminated the extra fullness at the chest, yet still kept the ones at the shoulder blades for a comfortable movement.
5. The waist suppression was mostly a result of the natural drop from swelled chest and was not greatly done in itself (which usually results in an hourglass silhouette)… something that is certainly not desirable. This topic of waist suppression is a broad one and will be covered with the principles of balance in a jacket. The “skirt” of the jacket is often tapered and sort of moves inward in a “convex” manner rather than flair out. This effect certainly caught on heavily sometime after mid-30s and remained ever popular with the smart dressers. (See AA/Esky Vol. II No. III section I for a detailed explanation).
Yet the soft construction is an ideal thing, and it is one of the modern improvements in clothing. It finds real favor in London. Fashion observers have spent many months in London in the places where the well-dressed Englishmen congregate. They have found the soft construction English lounge suit worn in London by men considered the world over as being well-dressed, and they have brought this fashion to America for its first appearance. The tailor by appointment to the Prince of Wales is actually responsible for this new mode of West End tailoring and other well-known West End tailoring shops have adopted his procedure in the cutting and making of clothes.
On the opposite page is a diagram of the model which is important in London this year. It is a single breasted coat in the two button peak lapel style,* well cut away in the front.
*See Vol. II No. IV Section I for an illustartion of this.
The coat is built on natural lines, and is cut on the long side. The shoulders arc natural, having a slight puff at the sleeve heads, and the sleeves taper definitely to the cuffs where there arc four small buttons. Instead of having the extreme fullness in the chest where it is just excess material that serves no purpose, this jacket is constructed to give natural ease and an athletic appearance to the wearer. There is a small natural break in the front at each shoulder such as all well-tailored clothes should have, but under the arms and chest there is enough excess material to give fullness and a much larger appearance to the chest of the coat. This eliminates the necessity of tightening the waistline, of course, for the waistline is quite natural. The same balance is carried out to the back of the coat, too, so that at all times the wearer has a broad, athletic look, and yet his clothes do not have an exaggerated appearance. And what is most important of all is the fact that this particular method of tailoring is adaptable to all clothes.
On the same page where the English drape is illustrated, there is a detail sketch of the new London lounge which shows how effective English-tailored fullness of the coat can be. While it is true that this coat is buttoned on the bottom button, the tailoring itself remains unchanged, and the shadows show definitely where the fullness lies. This loose-fitting coat is the model worn by the well-dressed Englishman, and its unusual shape gives the proper effect to make its wearer look well dressed at ail times. Comfort is one of the primary factors, and perhaps the fact that there are no purposeless wrinkles is one of the greatest advantages of this coat. The model is adaptable to every type of individual and reveals, for the first time, the secret of the West End tailors. It will be noted throughout this issue that the various fashion sketches call particular attention to the fullness under the chest and arms. This is a feature of great importance, and the sketches of the London Portfolio, done in color, definitely emphasize how it is carried out in various models.
1. The shoulder is the same is Drape, no major difference here both the natural line and the soft effect is retained.
2. Note that the drape in the chest is reduced as opposed to the pervious illustration. This is done to “clean” out the chest of excessive fullness, which was (even though very smart) still not liked by many people due to the resulting “wrinkles” per se. Yet, despite the removal of excessive drape from the front, the fullness at the back was kept intact as it certainly allowed for a free arm movement.
3. The effect at the waist or “suppression” seems less drastic than the pervious model. Note that there is not change at the actual level of waist point. All of this is resulting from the increased or decreased “swelled” chest that is a hallmark of drape jacket.
4. The skirt, following the over all natural lines is not flared out as in certain militaristic or equestrian silhouettes. The overall lines are rather close to the body but not a “tight” fit.
5. The buttons stance in the original jackets of the era was slightly lower, certainly more so than the current Neapolitan incarnations or modern Savile row. This buttons stance is certainly not written in stone but for the purpose of maintaining aesthetical value (& also pragmatic) it should be neither too high… and certainly not too low as to suggest a low-slung effect observable in DB jackets from 80s.
The tailcoat offers no exception to the adaptability of this method of tailoring, for actually such fullness is particularly well suited to it, and it adds much to the smartness of the coat itself. The tailcoat model featured in this issue exemplifies this fact, and it will be noted that the coat is actually, cut larger under the chest. This coat has even more fullness from the shoulder blades in the back to the waist, where the excess amount of material is placed. The coat itself gives the much desired effect which is the main note of English clothes. The coat actually follows the natural lines of the body, allowing comfort at needed points. It gives as much as smartness to the stout man as it does to the thin man, and is certain to find favor with well dressed men in general.
It has been pointed out that in an attempt to acquire the English effect in tailoring, many American tailors exaggerate the English drape to such an extent that the coat was a failure. The trousers, however, suffered an even worse distortion of interpretation in many cases. Peg top trousers which come just below the ankle and are very tapered have been advertised as the true British trousers which should accompany the English drape suit. These trousers, however, are never worn in England except, perhaps by very old men who have been wearing the same suit for over a decade. Actually, the English trousers, though still cut high, do not taper much. They are cut very full and loose, and are approximately 19” (for size 38 ) wide at the bottom and usually carry cuffs. These are the correct trousers for wear with the new clothes, even though they are entirely different from the trousers so popular.
The trousers which accompany the new London lounge are modern in their fashion interpretation, and are much more in keeping with present times than peg top trousers.* They have the same general features and characteristics as the jacket itself, and are typical of the trousers worn by the well dressed men of London. Cut full and loose, these trousers are made in proportion to the wearer, and carry even further desired effect always obtained by fashion-conscious men.
*This paragraph needs some explanation. First off, to understand what they are referring to as “modern”, “loose” & “full-cut” pants you have to understand the pervious “peg-top” trousers. These were the trousers that accompanied the suit jacket during the first quarter on the century. It was meant to accompany the “boyish” cut like jacket of WW I era. As explained in detail last time (see Vol. II No. IV Section I) this younger “boyish” or rather un-athletic look was (almost) completely replaced in early 20s & perfected in 30s by the “new” drape look…when the sports mania over took the U.K and US.
DO NOT mistake this loose fit of 30s with how it is used today. They (AA) were comparing the fit of these drape trousers by that worn in pervious decades, which were certainly narrow or close fitting by these new standards.
Typically English throughout in the way it is tailored, the London lounge suit has all the desirable features of the English drape and none of its drawbacks. The fullness which makes the English tailoring so much respected by fashion leaders of the world is present, but without the unnecessary wrinkles of the (pervious) English Drape model, and this fullness affords so much comfort on the part of the wearer that its promotional possibilities become a forgone conclusion. Already well established in London as an essential part of the well dressed man’s wardrobe, it now promises to find parallel favor in America, provided, of course, it is produced authentically.
Not only have the best dressed Londoners accepted the London lounge suit, but many of the American men who very definitely lead American fashions have done likewise. Many of the best dressed men of America were seen by the AA fashion observers in London during the course of the past summer, and the majority of them were either having their clothes made there by the west end tailors or were bringing back to their own tailors in America the ideas they had seen while they were abroad. The readiness with which these man accepted the fullness of the English tailoring, particularly as it was incorporated in the London lounge suit, is highly significant because it is indicative of a coming American trend. These men may be considered as fashion barometers for America, and when they show their approval of some fashion, as they have in the case of the full-cut London lounge suit, it is a reliable indication that wide acceptance will soon follow throughout America.
Thus it is safe to say that the London lounge will make a successful bid for popularity in this country in the near future, and since this is the case, now is the proper time for alert merchants to take advantage of its promotional possibilities, in order that they may be among the first to introduce it to here. The suit has many features to recommend it, as has already been pointed out but these features must be shown and stressed, of course, if it is to find a real favor. Promotion is always necessary for any new fashion imported from abroad, and the London lounge suit is no exception to this rule. Yet all this really means is that it must be given a chance. Merchants need fear no failure on the part of this new note from London, if they promote it properly, for every feature of this new suit is one that the men of America have been looking for. This may seem a broad statement, for American men are not noted for the zeal with which they search out sartorial innovations. Yet it can be said that they have actually been awaiting the advent of the new London lounge, unconsciously if not consciously, for it incorporates all the features of comfort and appearance which they esteem.
Now that we have looked over the basic aspects of these jackets and their important features, it is essential that basic principles involved in the creation of these apparel articles must also be understood. Since the AA text describes the arrival of these jackets from west end London, it would only be common sense to learn about the key elements that the cutters of these jackets (in London) were bearing in mind when cutting them in their Savile row shops.
For that nothing works better than getting back to the source. Here, I have explained a very rare text written sometime in 1928 by the editor of the famed “Tailor and Cutter” British tailoring magazine. This iconic text was later used in publications in 1933 and 1936.
Below is the first part of this text. Hopefully, we will proceed with the remaining key elements next time. This is Very important that you understand what is described in here. I am not going to break this piece as really all of it is equally important.
On Balance
Balance is the most important principle in cutting, and it is as well first to define it. It is the equality or just proportion of weight, form, length, etc.; equipoise or counterpoise.
In tailoring, balance is generally defined as the relative length of back and front or of two sides. It is sometimes thought of as the relative length of the back and front of a coat that is, the height from the depth of scye line up to the nape at back, and from the same line up to the neck point in front; or, in lieu of the latter, from the front of scye to the neck point The general hang of a garment is also referred to as the balance.
Balance may be called, as has been said, equipoise or counterpoise; forces acting in harmony; parts arranged in unison. The sections of a garment are in equilibrium when they severally act and re-act on each other with equal force. When there is perfect unison between the various parts of a coat and also with the figure it has to cover, then there is balance.
This principle crops up in every garment and in almost every section, and enters into cutting, trying-on, and making. The poise of a garment is often destroyed by careless making. We have it on the authority of Holy Writ that a false balance is an abomination, and it is certainly the cause of most of the defects which trouble a cutter!
As a general definition, balance may be said to be the harmonious arrangement of the front and back, or two sides, with the attitude of the figure; this applying to coats, vests, trousers, sleeves, etc.
There are several kinds of balance. The first may be called ideal balance. This is the size or balance of a draft, pattern, or figure, reckoned by a proportion or division of the chest measure, or by a strictly proportionate system of mensuration. This is the balance a system would give if drafted out for a proportionate figure. Every system has its equality of ratios, whether worked out by direct measures, shoulder measures, or chest measures.
Another type of balance may be called natural balance. This is where the balance of pattern or draft is equal at back and front; where the front and back sections show an equal proportion, although they may not agree with the breast measure. For instance, a pattern for a 36 ” breast man might show 8 ½” depth of scye and an equal decrease of front; or a 9 ½” depth of scye and an equal increase of front. There would still be equipoise, but it would not be the ideal balance as we understand it. Although the lengths are equal, they are not in an ideal ratio with the breadths.
A third type may be named specific balance. It is obvious hat we may have a draft, pattern, or garment where there is neither the ideal balance nor the equipoise which has been called natural balance. The front and back lengths may not tally; the scales tilt up or down, as it were; and yet the draft, pattern, etc., would be correct for a specific figure. There is the just proportion but not the equal proportion. This would be the case in various figures, such as the stooping, erect, etc. But the simplest example is that of a lady’s coat, where there is a considerable difference between the back and front lengths, necessitated by the demands of the figure.
An important point is the effect that suppression has upon balance. The length at back and front may be very evenly adjusted above the breast line; and yet the equilibrium may be upset by an excess of, or incorrect arrangement of, suppression. Suppression, or the distribution of material at waist, is vital to the balance of front and back.
What makes the question of balance less simple than it otherwise would be is that not only must it vary with different figures but also with different garments. A waistcoat requires a very long back balance; a body coat also needs a long back balance. The balance of a jacket varies according to style: a close-fitting, well-suppressed lounge needs a longer back balance than one of a loose straight-hanging fashion. A relatively long front balance is necessary for an overcoat at any time; and often for style reasons a short back balance must be infused.
In ladies’ coats the correct standard of balance is obtained, not by giving an equality of length at back and front, but a just proportion. Compared with a man’s coat, a woman requires one short in the back balance. So far as style influencing balance is concerned, the same remarks apply to ladies’ as to gentlemen’s garments. A loose sac will require a short back balance to distribute the material correctly; and a close-fitting coat will need, relatively, a long back balance.
Cutters who specialize in ladies’ garments (and often those who are engaged in the wholesale trade) not only pay attention to general balance, but also to that particular balance which governs sections. Especially is this the case in a coat with many seams, where balance-marks are placed at the waist and other parts, and also in the sleeves.
Balance is a factor in sections of a garment, and notably with sleeves. The hang of a sleeve means a lot in comfort and appearance; and it may be affected in various ways. The distance between the top of hind arm and forearm may be altered by raising or lowering the points; but the balance can be tilted one way or another without touching those points. It is possible to swing the bottom of forearm backward or forward by inserting or taking out a wedge at hind arm; or by a suitable arrangement of lines to draft a sleeve in harmony with these changes. The pitching of sleeve often decides the balance. While it is true that a badly hanging sleeve may be due to faulty pitching, it is also true that many good sleeves owe much to an intelligent adjustment in that direction.
In trousers we have various kinds of balance. Openness and looseness is really a sort of balance. There is, too, the change brought about by cutting a forward front and its concomitant, an open or crooked seat. These are general types. There is the special one necessitated by the stooping figure, which calls for a. short front and a long back; or the erect one which demands a long front and a short back. There is also that particular balance, required for a corpulent figure, of extra length of front and corresponding shortness of back, accompanied by a more open cut in the legs.
Then there is the balance of the topside on the underside, that the parts may be “ fair,” for which marks or “nicks;’ are placed. The tilting of the scales one way or the other by faulty manipulation will often have disastrous effects. And there is he deliberate change of balance-marks for prominent calves, or for prominent thighs and calves.
There are many ways of altering balance. One may draft out a coat and impose a change, or take a carefully adjusted pattern and make variations from it. For a longer front balance an addition can be made across the shoulder, or the side-seam point lowered. For a short back balance a piece may be taken off at neck and shoulder, or the side-seam point of back raised. For a short front balance the shoulder or the side-seam may be utilized; and for a long back balance the neck and shoulder may be raised, or side-seam point lowered. Again, there is the wedge method of varying the harmony fore and aft, in accordance with the necessities of the figure.
In a body-coat the length of forepart at front may be varied for the type of man who bends forward or backward, while the skirt section can also be regulated.
In a finished garment the methods of altering the balance are restricted; not that the same changes could not be made as in a pattern, but some alterations would appreciably lower the profits on an order. In a made-up coat, then, the side-seam is utilized, when possible, and the back or forepart passed up or down as the case may be.
Very briefly, some of the effects of incorrect balance may be indicated. A long back balance causes a looseness about the top of back and a closeness on the hips. A short back balance will cause the coat to stand away at the hips and to fall away at the back of neck. A long front balance produces a garment which falls away at front and hangs away at the back; if buttoned, the extra length would show itself at the chest. A short front balance lifts the coat up at front and makes it uncomfortable. These defects would also affect the scye at back and front.
Like mentioned above, hopefully, next time I will explain the concepts of waist suppression and neck positioning points (straightness and crookedness) in lounge jackets.
END OF SECTION I OF THIS POST
Here is the long awaited AA / Esky post full with text, diagrams and illustrations. With every post I say to my self that I am not doing something this detailed again, and yet every one of them is more detailed than the pervious ones. Obviously, this has to stop sometime if I plan to work and make a living. However, that aside this post is probably the most detailed of all the pervious ones taking a gigantic 70+ hours of work to create. It has more (summer ensembles) in it than ever before.
The text, naturally is also quite extensive and is divided into five sections which are as follows; Section 1 goes over where the lounge jackets discussion was left off last time (see Vol. II No. IV section I), this section goes over the Drape and London Lounge (British Blade) versions with diagrams and what the market was like when the first were brought over to US from west end London. Then you will go over a rare (& detailed) discussion about one of the key elements involved in cutting. i.e. Balance. Section II goes over summer fabrics details and some of the most common spots where the haute monde were spotted. Section III is a unique & detailed article about the Sports Shirts used in 1930s. Section IV is illustrations with text and finally section V is simply a beautiful (though not quite as pragmatic) article about what Savile Row was like in 20s and 30s. The best part about it, is the fact that it was written in 1937, so it is not like somebody is recalling it 7 decades later.
As always, try to not to rush through this post… for your own good. Some concepts explained are advanced but most are fairly easy to grasp with slight consideration on the part of the reader. Remember, if you see me cross referencing that is because I want you to understand how interconnected all of this stuff is. So be sure to do all the prior reading.
And… before you get a little carried away in the time zone… bear in mind the fact that seven decades have passed since most of this was written. As such you should be able to absorb the principles from here and move on in to our times. How you understand and express these principles in this day and age is going to be of paramount importance.
But before I start, I would like to thank our members Mark Seitelman, (& his associate Don) and zegnamtl for their help with scanning and editing illustrations presented in this post.
This first article is from winter 35-36 season and takes you behind the scenes of 30s apparel industry & how were they reacting to the arrival of these fascinating clothes from finest west end tailoring establishments. A BIG thanks to Manton for his help with illustartions in this section.
The New London Lounge
Why do the best dressed men in the world go to Saville Row, London, for their clothes? That is at least fifty percent a rhetorical question and, by definition, a rhetorical question one that is asked for the sake of effect. The answer to that question, if one is needed, is the same as the definition. Many of the best dressed men have their clothes tailored at Saville Row purely for the sake of effect. It is a recognized fact that clothes are cut, tailored and fitted better in America than in England.*
* Talk about changed times! Well this can be argued for the bespoke tailoring of 30s, there was certainly no doubt about this with respect to RTW clothing.
But for all that, the famous tailors of Saville Row and the West End of London put into their clothes something which is inimitably their own—a certain effect which is the vital factor that makes English clothing so much admired. This factor, incidentally, is not one that is always consciously recognized. Many of those who go to London for their clothes couldn’t tell you precisely why they select that city as tailoring center for smart dress. But nevertheless it is the effect that makes the difference, and where that effect is exaggerated or misinterpreted in any way by tailors in other sections of the globe then, obviously, it is no longer the same effect.
Perhaps nothing illustrates this point as well as the introduction of the English Drape to America several seasons ago. It was intended to achieve a certain definite effect, and was supposedly an interpretation of authentic English clothing. Patterning their clothes after the English, American tailors put a definite drape in the chest of the coat. The shoulders were made wide and square with wrinkles at the sleeve head.*
*Take note of these changes. It is of paramount importance that the original and the derived effect are differentiated and properly understood.
The waist line was pulled in, and the coat was tight about the hips. The greatest point of merit of the particular model was the fact that it inaugurated soft construction clothes in America. Unfortunately, however, many American tailors failed to get the effect they had tried so hard to achieve. The coat was exaggerated, and it didn’t bring out the right, nonchalant, smart appearance of the English custom coat after all. It showed too much of it, and the result was far from being successful. The illustration below* shows the English drape as it was introduced to America, and it also shows why manufacturers and retailers alike will admit that it was undoubtedly the hardest thing to sell. Consumers would not buy wrinkles in clothes then, and they will not buy them in clothes today.
Alright to break away for a moment and explain the much essential details which are a feature of this cut so as you are reading, you have a clear idea what they are referring to. Kindly Read last post for further details (AA/Esky Vol. II No. IV April 06’ Section I)
AA / ESKY VOL. II NO. IV
1. One of the most important aspect of the English drape jacket is the much needed natural shoulder. This can be done in a variety of ways to effect different looks. There is no correct or incorrect style here… the only incorrectness if there would be… is excessive padding. Shoulders here are in a concave like pitch and show a very slight rope effect at the end.
Before you proceed… read Manton’s great article The Neapolitan Shoulder Explained on Natural Shoulders in the featured article section… as all the necessary info is explained there in extensive detail.
2. Sleeves have a slight “puff” effect to them at the sleeve head not to mention the extra wrinkles that are caused by the excess cloth that is fed through a smaller armhole.
3 & 4. The most essential feature of the drape jacket is obviously “the drape” effect observable at chest region. In the early English drape models (as you will see through the course of this article) the drape was very obvious and well articulated. Maybe too much… and the result was that the smart dressed set… sort of back tracked and eliminated the extra fullness at the chest, yet still kept the ones at the shoulder blades for a comfortable movement.
5. The waist suppression was mostly a result of the natural drop from swelled chest and was not greatly done in itself (which usually results in an hourglass silhouette)… something that is certainly not desirable. This topic of waist suppression is a broad one and will be covered with the principles of balance in a jacket. The “skirt” of the jacket is often tapered and sort of moves inward in a “convex” manner rather than flair out. This effect certainly caught on heavily sometime after mid-30s and remained ever popular with the smart dressers. (See AA/Esky Vol. II No. III section I for a detailed explanation).
Yet the soft construction is an ideal thing, and it is one of the modern improvements in clothing. It finds real favor in London. Fashion observers have spent many months in London in the places where the well-dressed Englishmen congregate. They have found the soft construction English lounge suit worn in London by men considered the world over as being well-dressed, and they have brought this fashion to America for its first appearance. The tailor by appointment to the Prince of Wales is actually responsible for this new mode of West End tailoring and other well-known West End tailoring shops have adopted his procedure in the cutting and making of clothes.
On the opposite page is a diagram of the model which is important in London this year. It is a single breasted coat in the two button peak lapel style,* well cut away in the front.
*See Vol. II No. IV Section I for an illustartion of this.
The coat is built on natural lines, and is cut on the long side. The shoulders arc natural, having a slight puff at the sleeve heads, and the sleeves taper definitely to the cuffs where there arc four small buttons. Instead of having the extreme fullness in the chest where it is just excess material that serves no purpose, this jacket is constructed to give natural ease and an athletic appearance to the wearer. There is a small natural break in the front at each shoulder such as all well-tailored clothes should have, but under the arms and chest there is enough excess material to give fullness and a much larger appearance to the chest of the coat. This eliminates the necessity of tightening the waistline, of course, for the waistline is quite natural. The same balance is carried out to the back of the coat, too, so that at all times the wearer has a broad, athletic look, and yet his clothes do not have an exaggerated appearance. And what is most important of all is the fact that this particular method of tailoring is adaptable to all clothes.
On the same page where the English drape is illustrated, there is a detail sketch of the new London lounge which shows how effective English-tailored fullness of the coat can be. While it is true that this coat is buttoned on the bottom button, the tailoring itself remains unchanged, and the shadows show definitely where the fullness lies. This loose-fitting coat is the model worn by the well-dressed Englishman, and its unusual shape gives the proper effect to make its wearer look well dressed at ail times. Comfort is one of the primary factors, and perhaps the fact that there are no purposeless wrinkles is one of the greatest advantages of this coat. The model is adaptable to every type of individual and reveals, for the first time, the secret of the West End tailors. It will be noted throughout this issue that the various fashion sketches call particular attention to the fullness under the chest and arms. This is a feature of great importance, and the sketches of the London Portfolio, done in color, definitely emphasize how it is carried out in various models.
1. The shoulder is the same is Drape, no major difference here both the natural line and the soft effect is retained.
2. Note that the drape in the chest is reduced as opposed to the pervious illustration. This is done to “clean” out the chest of excessive fullness, which was (even though very smart) still not liked by many people due to the resulting “wrinkles” per se. Yet, despite the removal of excessive drape from the front, the fullness at the back was kept intact as it certainly allowed for a free arm movement.
3. The effect at the waist or “suppression” seems less drastic than the pervious model. Note that there is not change at the actual level of waist point. All of this is resulting from the increased or decreased “swelled” chest that is a hallmark of drape jacket.
4. The skirt, following the over all natural lines is not flared out as in certain militaristic or equestrian silhouettes. The overall lines are rather close to the body but not a “tight” fit.
5. The buttons stance in the original jackets of the era was slightly lower, certainly more so than the current Neapolitan incarnations or modern Savile row. This buttons stance is certainly not written in stone but for the purpose of maintaining aesthetical value (& also pragmatic) it should be neither too high… and certainly not too low as to suggest a low-slung effect observable in DB jackets from 80s.
The tailcoat offers no exception to the adaptability of this method of tailoring, for actually such fullness is particularly well suited to it, and it adds much to the smartness of the coat itself. The tailcoat model featured in this issue exemplifies this fact, and it will be noted that the coat is actually, cut larger under the chest. This coat has even more fullness from the shoulder blades in the back to the waist, where the excess amount of material is placed. The coat itself gives the much desired effect which is the main note of English clothes. The coat actually follows the natural lines of the body, allowing comfort at needed points. It gives as much as smartness to the stout man as it does to the thin man, and is certain to find favor with well dressed men in general.
It has been pointed out that in an attempt to acquire the English effect in tailoring, many American tailors exaggerate the English drape to such an extent that the coat was a failure. The trousers, however, suffered an even worse distortion of interpretation in many cases. Peg top trousers which come just below the ankle and are very tapered have been advertised as the true British trousers which should accompany the English drape suit. These trousers, however, are never worn in England except, perhaps by very old men who have been wearing the same suit for over a decade. Actually, the English trousers, though still cut high, do not taper much. They are cut very full and loose, and are approximately 19” (for size 38 ) wide at the bottom and usually carry cuffs. These are the correct trousers for wear with the new clothes, even though they are entirely different from the trousers so popular.
The trousers which accompany the new London lounge are modern in their fashion interpretation, and are much more in keeping with present times than peg top trousers.* They have the same general features and characteristics as the jacket itself, and are typical of the trousers worn by the well dressed men of London. Cut full and loose, these trousers are made in proportion to the wearer, and carry even further desired effect always obtained by fashion-conscious men.
*This paragraph needs some explanation. First off, to understand what they are referring to as “modern”, “loose” & “full-cut” pants you have to understand the pervious “peg-top” trousers. These were the trousers that accompanied the suit jacket during the first quarter on the century. It was meant to accompany the “boyish” cut like jacket of WW I era. As explained in detail last time (see Vol. II No. IV Section I) this younger “boyish” or rather un-athletic look was (almost) completely replaced in early 20s & perfected in 30s by the “new” drape look…when the sports mania over took the U.K and US.
DO NOT mistake this loose fit of 30s with how it is used today. They (AA) were comparing the fit of these drape trousers by that worn in pervious decades, which were certainly narrow or close fitting by these new standards.
Typically English throughout in the way it is tailored, the London lounge suit has all the desirable features of the English drape and none of its drawbacks. The fullness which makes the English tailoring so much respected by fashion leaders of the world is present, but without the unnecessary wrinkles of the (pervious) English Drape model, and this fullness affords so much comfort on the part of the wearer that its promotional possibilities become a forgone conclusion. Already well established in London as an essential part of the well dressed man’s wardrobe, it now promises to find parallel favor in America, provided, of course, it is produced authentically.
Not only have the best dressed Londoners accepted the London lounge suit, but many of the American men who very definitely lead American fashions have done likewise. Many of the best dressed men of America were seen by the AA fashion observers in London during the course of the past summer, and the majority of them were either having their clothes made there by the west end tailors or were bringing back to their own tailors in America the ideas they had seen while they were abroad. The readiness with which these man accepted the fullness of the English tailoring, particularly as it was incorporated in the London lounge suit, is highly significant because it is indicative of a coming American trend. These men may be considered as fashion barometers for America, and when they show their approval of some fashion, as they have in the case of the full-cut London lounge suit, it is a reliable indication that wide acceptance will soon follow throughout America.
Thus it is safe to say that the London lounge will make a successful bid for popularity in this country in the near future, and since this is the case, now is the proper time for alert merchants to take advantage of its promotional possibilities, in order that they may be among the first to introduce it to here. The suit has many features to recommend it, as has already been pointed out but these features must be shown and stressed, of course, if it is to find a real favor. Promotion is always necessary for any new fashion imported from abroad, and the London lounge suit is no exception to this rule. Yet all this really means is that it must be given a chance. Merchants need fear no failure on the part of this new note from London, if they promote it properly, for every feature of this new suit is one that the men of America have been looking for. This may seem a broad statement, for American men are not noted for the zeal with which they search out sartorial innovations. Yet it can be said that they have actually been awaiting the advent of the new London lounge, unconsciously if not consciously, for it incorporates all the features of comfort and appearance which they esteem.
Now that we have looked over the basic aspects of these jackets and their important features, it is essential that basic principles involved in the creation of these apparel articles must also be understood. Since the AA text describes the arrival of these jackets from west end London, it would only be common sense to learn about the key elements that the cutters of these jackets (in London) were bearing in mind when cutting them in their Savile row shops.
For that nothing works better than getting back to the source. Here, I have explained a very rare text written sometime in 1928 by the editor of the famed “Tailor and Cutter” British tailoring magazine. This iconic text was later used in publications in 1933 and 1936.
Below is the first part of this text. Hopefully, we will proceed with the remaining key elements next time. This is Very important that you understand what is described in here. I am not going to break this piece as really all of it is equally important.
On Balance
Balance is the most important principle in cutting, and it is as well first to define it. It is the equality or just proportion of weight, form, length, etc.; equipoise or counterpoise.
In tailoring, balance is generally defined as the relative length of back and front or of two sides. It is sometimes thought of as the relative length of the back and front of a coat that is, the height from the depth of scye line up to the nape at back, and from the same line up to the neck point in front; or, in lieu of the latter, from the front of scye to the neck point The general hang of a garment is also referred to as the balance.
Balance may be called, as has been said, equipoise or counterpoise; forces acting in harmony; parts arranged in unison. The sections of a garment are in equilibrium when they severally act and re-act on each other with equal force. When there is perfect unison between the various parts of a coat and also with the figure it has to cover, then there is balance.
This principle crops up in every garment and in almost every section, and enters into cutting, trying-on, and making. The poise of a garment is often destroyed by careless making. We have it on the authority of Holy Writ that a false balance is an abomination, and it is certainly the cause of most of the defects which trouble a cutter!
As a general definition, balance may be said to be the harmonious arrangement of the front and back, or two sides, with the attitude of the figure; this applying to coats, vests, trousers, sleeves, etc.
There are several kinds of balance. The first may be called ideal balance. This is the size or balance of a draft, pattern, or figure, reckoned by a proportion or division of the chest measure, or by a strictly proportionate system of mensuration. This is the balance a system would give if drafted out for a proportionate figure. Every system has its equality of ratios, whether worked out by direct measures, shoulder measures, or chest measures.
Another type of balance may be called natural balance. This is where the balance of pattern or draft is equal at back and front; where the front and back sections show an equal proportion, although they may not agree with the breast measure. For instance, a pattern for a 36 ” breast man might show 8 ½” depth of scye and an equal decrease of front; or a 9 ½” depth of scye and an equal increase of front. There would still be equipoise, but it would not be the ideal balance as we understand it. Although the lengths are equal, they are not in an ideal ratio with the breadths.
A third type may be named specific balance. It is obvious hat we may have a draft, pattern, or garment where there is neither the ideal balance nor the equipoise which has been called natural balance. The front and back lengths may not tally; the scales tilt up or down, as it were; and yet the draft, pattern, etc., would be correct for a specific figure. There is the just proportion but not the equal proportion. This would be the case in various figures, such as the stooping, erect, etc. But the simplest example is that of a lady’s coat, where there is a considerable difference between the back and front lengths, necessitated by the demands of the figure.
An important point is the effect that suppression has upon balance. The length at back and front may be very evenly adjusted above the breast line; and yet the equilibrium may be upset by an excess of, or incorrect arrangement of, suppression. Suppression, or the distribution of material at waist, is vital to the balance of front and back.
What makes the question of balance less simple than it otherwise would be is that not only must it vary with different figures but also with different garments. A waistcoat requires a very long back balance; a body coat also needs a long back balance. The balance of a jacket varies according to style: a close-fitting, well-suppressed lounge needs a longer back balance than one of a loose straight-hanging fashion. A relatively long front balance is necessary for an overcoat at any time; and often for style reasons a short back balance must be infused.
In ladies’ coats the correct standard of balance is obtained, not by giving an equality of length at back and front, but a just proportion. Compared with a man’s coat, a woman requires one short in the back balance. So far as style influencing balance is concerned, the same remarks apply to ladies’ as to gentlemen’s garments. A loose sac will require a short back balance to distribute the material correctly; and a close-fitting coat will need, relatively, a long back balance.
Cutters who specialize in ladies’ garments (and often those who are engaged in the wholesale trade) not only pay attention to general balance, but also to that particular balance which governs sections. Especially is this the case in a coat with many seams, where balance-marks are placed at the waist and other parts, and also in the sleeves.
Balance is a factor in sections of a garment, and notably with sleeves. The hang of a sleeve means a lot in comfort and appearance; and it may be affected in various ways. The distance between the top of hind arm and forearm may be altered by raising or lowering the points; but the balance can be tilted one way or another without touching those points. It is possible to swing the bottom of forearm backward or forward by inserting or taking out a wedge at hind arm; or by a suitable arrangement of lines to draft a sleeve in harmony with these changes. The pitching of sleeve often decides the balance. While it is true that a badly hanging sleeve may be due to faulty pitching, it is also true that many good sleeves owe much to an intelligent adjustment in that direction.
In trousers we have various kinds of balance. Openness and looseness is really a sort of balance. There is, too, the change brought about by cutting a forward front and its concomitant, an open or crooked seat. These are general types. There is the special one necessitated by the stooping figure, which calls for a. short front and a long back; or the erect one which demands a long front and a short back. There is also that particular balance, required for a corpulent figure, of extra length of front and corresponding shortness of back, accompanied by a more open cut in the legs.
Then there is the balance of the topside on the underside, that the parts may be “ fair,” for which marks or “nicks;’ are placed. The tilting of the scales one way or the other by faulty manipulation will often have disastrous effects. And there is he deliberate change of balance-marks for prominent calves, or for prominent thighs and calves.
There are many ways of altering balance. One may draft out a coat and impose a change, or take a carefully adjusted pattern and make variations from it. For a longer front balance an addition can be made across the shoulder, or the side-seam point lowered. For a short back balance a piece may be taken off at neck and shoulder, or the side-seam point of back raised. For a short front balance the shoulder or the side-seam may be utilized; and for a long back balance the neck and shoulder may be raised, or side-seam point lowered. Again, there is the wedge method of varying the harmony fore and aft, in accordance with the necessities of the figure.
In a body-coat the length of forepart at front may be varied for the type of man who bends forward or backward, while the skirt section can also be regulated.
In a finished garment the methods of altering the balance are restricted; not that the same changes could not be made as in a pattern, but some alterations would appreciably lower the profits on an order. In a made-up coat, then, the side-seam is utilized, when possible, and the back or forepart passed up or down as the case may be.
Very briefly, some of the effects of incorrect balance may be indicated. A long back balance causes a looseness about the top of back and a closeness on the hips. A short back balance will cause the coat to stand away at the hips and to fall away at the back of neck. A long front balance produces a garment which falls away at front and hangs away at the back; if buttoned, the extra length would show itself at the chest. A short front balance lifts the coat up at front and makes it uncomfortable. These defects would also affect the scye at back and front.
Like mentioned above, hopefully, next time I will explain the concepts of waist suppression and neck positioning points (straightness and crookedness) in lounge jackets.
END OF SECTION I OF THIS POST