Z Zegna and Strellson - your opinions
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:05 pm
I am wondering what the members here feel of the quality of suits from the Z Zegna line or from Strellson.
I have a very difficult time with RTW suits (6'3", 37" sleeve, 36" waist) but have found that a 48T from Z Zegna or a 46T from Strellson are a good approximation and could probably be very good with adequate tailoring. For instance, rather than a standard 6" drop, we measured the waist on the Zegna pants to be 37".
In Vancouver, the Zegna runs about $1000 CDN (430 GBP or 850 USD) while a Strellson suit from their "business" line is about $800 CDN.
Any thoughts about the worthiness of these particular lines, or does someone have a suggestion of another brand that would be worth trying.
Up until now I have relied on a Hong Kong tailor who comes through town twice a year for my suits as I simply can't find anything that fits properly. His prices are starting to rise and I am considering moving to RTW and trade what might be a drop in quality and an increase in price for the luxury of having the suits within 10 days rather than 10 weeks.
Thanks,
Matt
I have a very difficult time with RTW suits (6'3", 37" sleeve, 36" waist) but have found that a 48T from Z Zegna or a 46T from Strellson are a good approximation and could probably be very good with adequate tailoring. For instance, rather than a standard 6" drop, we measured the waist on the Zegna pants to be 37".
In Vancouver, the Zegna runs about $1000 CDN (430 GBP or 850 USD) while a Strellson suit from their "business" line is about $800 CDN.
Any thoughts about the worthiness of these particular lines, or does someone have a suggestion of another brand that would be worth trying.
Up until now I have relied on a Hong Kong tailor who comes through town twice a year for my suits as I simply can't find anything that fits properly. His prices are starting to rise and I am considering moving to RTW and trade what might be a drop in quality and an increase in price for the luxury of having the suits within 10 days rather than 10 weeks.
Thanks,
Matt