I understand. I was just trying to re-emphasize that this sportcoat is not made on their normal model which is quite different. This one is more of a jacket based on a shirt, and much better than the norm IMO.alden wrote:Of course, Matt, we are only seeing pictures so its hard to get a good idea. I was cringing at the thought of what it might be, and in the end it isn't that bad. I am not sure "impressed" is as correct a description as relieved.
Michael
Glance inside Borrelli
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:13 pm
- Location: Castle Douglas, Scotland
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:33 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Thanks for the valiant effort SG, what is really needed, I think, is not only better lighting but a better camera. I shall endeavour to borrow one and post the results in a new thread.
I am most grateful for the interest exhibited already!
-EB
I am most grateful for the interest exhibited already!
-EB
Bird, I think that it's a sharp looking suit and the whole outfit is nicely put together too.
You're right, you probably want the jacket a bit shorter, the waist less suppressed, and the coat sleeves a little trimmer.
Ofcourse, it's all about what you like and not us, but I think FWIW, that It looks good on you and what you already intuitively know is pointing you in the right direction in your choices.
You're right, you probably want the jacket a bit shorter, the waist less suppressed, and the coat sleeves a little trimmer.
Ofcourse, it's all about what you like and not us, but I think FWIW, that It looks good on you and what you already intuitively know is pointing you in the right direction in your choices.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests