Bespoke property rights: who owns the pattern / last?

"The brute covers himself, the rich man and the fop adorn themselves, the elegant man dresses!"

-Honore de Balzac

SilkCity
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:54 pm
Contact:

Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:20 pm

I've already willingly and gratefully ceded my soul to Caraceni (Rome); thus everything else must follow.
AlexanderKabbaz
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: East Hampton & New York
Contact:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:47 am

The photograper owns the right to the picture as well, even though you might have paid him to photograph you.
Having been a bit intimate with this field a while back, in my experience you have stated the default, sans "pre-nup", circumstance. However, in this particular arena, ownership of the photos (and negatives) is often a negotiated agreement. Such is the common pactice in the field of photography.

In the bespoke trades, in common practice it is always accepted that the maker owns all of the tools which enabled the creation. The pattern/last/tamplate is but one of those tools even if it is created solely for one individual.
Peterboy
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: Oslo
Contact:

Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:41 pm

Gentleman,
With all the respect, as a bespoke shoemaker myself, I would say that a pair of bespoke lasts are as personal for the lastmaker as the customer itself. Every house and lastmaker has its own culture and style and therefore is it respectless to bring it with you to a different house. In my shop every client is buying and paying for shoes and shoetrees, not lasts, it is a part of the local faculties.

J.P.Myhre
bespoke.shoes@mac.com
Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests