David,this is not what I would wear, it would not suit me. However, there must be room for young cutters and tailors to experiment, there must be space for the Brandellis and the young apprentices on the Row as there has been space for a Tommy Nutter, a Richard James. If we insist that there should be no change, then I would declare the Row dead.
From reading his bio it seems Brandelli was a shop keeper and merchandiser..neither a cutter nor a young apprentice like McQueen. His newest creations will be sold on Mr. Porter...another merchandiser. Birds of a feather...?
Ask Tom about his experience trying to teach tailoring and the young kids who couldn't be bothered to learn the craft because they were so keen to be rich designers. Whatever one wants to do in life, if one means to be successful and leave a mark, requires the sacrifice of craft. Brandellis design work looks like crap because it lacks craft. It doesn't lack design, it lacks craft. It is mindless.
I do not think SR is resistant to change..it is resistant to Ugly.
One final thought, you should not turn over the British Museum or Louvre to a young designer curator who will decide to spray paint the Mona Lisa to prove his modernity. You let the real young Turks do it on their own, challenge from the outside and if what they do sticks...Bravo! You do not turn over institutions like Kilgour and Huntsman to them gratis. Luckily, A&S was not turned over carte blanche to McQueen. We would have gained McQueen but lost A&S. Speaking of A&S, their business is booming unlike H or K. Queer, isn't it?
Cheers
Michael