New Member

"The brute covers himself, the rich man and the fop adorn themselves, the elegant man dresses!"

-Honore de Balzac

Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:19 pm

Here is another example of the use of the distinction between "sack clothes" and "dress clothes":

Another necessity for the college man is the dinner coat. This may be either single or double-breasted, preferably double-breasted. This suit has many advantages. It is worn at fraternity dinners, smokers, theatre and many other evenings when a tail coat is too much and sack clothes are not enough.

Taken from:

http://thelondonlounge.net/gl/forum/vie ... php?t=6205
jb
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Contact:

Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:12 am

Sator,

My old boss was an Armenian from Turkey -- he still called the city Constantinople. You may recall that Ataturk borrowed from Western Europe in his quest to modernize Turkey. My boss did not have much respect for other tailors that he knew from that area; he called them "country tailors".

Interestingly I had to do my own research on cutting, as he did not use any books at all. Most of it was in his head, although he had a set of block patterns that he had drafted that he also referred to. As you may guess, I consider that a big weak spot in my knowledge.

We had competitors that cut clothing more along the sack coat lines, but we preferred to follow the body more. I can say that neither we nor our customers or competitors used the term "sack" or "lounge" coats. I was aware of the terms, of course. At that time, those distinctions seemed to have passed into history and we were just left with stylistic preferences as to cut, vs. distinct differences by formality and purpose.

I will see if I can get Chris Despos to weigh in here also. Although he is younger, he grew up in the business.

Cheers,
Joel
Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:36 am

It sounds like you were mostly drafting by pattern manipulation of block patterns.

Thank you for your insights. I enjoyed hearing about your recollections and anecdotes.
jb
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Contact:

Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:51 am

Sator,

I was not doing any drafting for him. My boss generally made measurements and then drew right on the cloth without a pattern. For difficult cases, he drew patterns on paper and checked them against his masters.

Cheers,
Joel
Sator
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:58 am

The tailor I go to also drafts directly onto the cloth in this manner.

It sounds like cutters like these draft like T. H. Holding - aka Mr Chopper - except with the graded block patterns kept in their heads.

Image
Last edited by Sator on Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
jb
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Contact:

Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:08 am

That makes sense, Sator.

Joel
Costi
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:53 am

I like the above interview, Sator. My tailor also draws directly on cloth. Since fitting is, in my opinion, an essential step in bespoke tailoring, I see no problem with this manner of cutting. At any rate, with established customers these fittings are more safety checks and styling sessions, as otherwise few if any changes are made to the garment.
Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests