Thank you gents for all the comments.
Concordia wrote:Overall cut is very attractive. I'd say it is flattering, but I have no real idea of what lies beneath and shouldn't presume too much about that.
To give you an idea what my regular jackets look like, I've uploaded some pictures of a dark blue sportsjacket with a tan windowpane into my album. I, too, believe that this is a more attractive cut.
Cufflink79 wrote:If I had one made I would have it in DB and SB, (ok thats two
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
)
Sigh...that would indeed be nice.
manton wrote:Murali: the cloth is so dark that it is a bit hard to see. Overall, it looks very good. From the side view, it appears that the vents are kicking out a little, and this is probably the result of a short back balance up top.
I've added to the same album lightened versions of the same pics. The colors may no longer be accurate but any fit issues should be more evident.
manton wrote:I would prefer an open seam at the shoulder (i.e., no little roll or bump at the sleevehead) but that too is purely aesthetic and a matter of taste.
You know, I hadn't even noticed that since the fabric is so lightweight. I would really hate that bump were the fabric heavier.
Doug wrote:In the side view there is a noticeable S shape to the line of the jacket down the back. My question to the experts is whether this is ideal or correct, or whether, say, the proper line of the jacket is to fall in a straight line down the back?
I'd be curious as well. I've always liked the S, when it hugs the person's back.