NJS

Fowler says the following on the subject (and I quote):I am sure that the full OED must have the pronunciation of 'covert' as a noun and, probably, Fowlers' Modern English Usage has it too - anyone have those to hand? - unless old Critch's say clinches it.
Yes. Expecting to collect all our books in a short time, for reasons beyond my control, my Fowler's is still in storage but, you are right it settles it - and spoils all the fun.Anonymous wrote:Fowler says the following on the subject (and I quote):I am sure that the full OED must have the pronunciation of 'covert' as a noun and, probably, Fowlers' Modern English Usage has it too - anyone have those to hand? - unless old Critch's say clinches it.
"covert, n. The -t is now so seldom sounded, & is so often omitted even in writing, that what distinction remains between covert & cover may be said to be valueless. The only sense in which covert, otherwise a Needless Variant, is worth preserving is the ornithologicial one (wing-coverts &c), in which the -t is invariable."
Unfortunately (because I was enjoying the debate) I think that must settle it...
Forgot to sign. ^Sartorius.Fowler says the following on the subject (and I quote):
"covert, n. The -t is now so seldom sounded, & is so often omitted even in writing, that what distinction remains between covert & cover may be said to be valueless. The only sense in which covert, otherwise a Needless Variant, is worth preserving is the ornithologicial one (wing-coverts &c), in which the -t is invariable."
Unfortunately (because I was enjoying the debate) I think that must settle it...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests