Matt, thank you!Anonymous wrote:It is called Self Edge and is on, I believe, 18th and Valencia. The web address is www.selfedge.com .
Andrey
Matt, thank you!Anonymous wrote:It is called Self Edge and is on, I believe, 18th and Valencia. The web address is www.selfedge.com .
No prob. I hope you can avoid looking like "the help" . Nice guy who runs the place, and knowledgeable about his product.Anonymous wrote:Matt, thank you!Anonymous wrote:It is called Self Edge and is on, I believe, 18th and Valencia. The web address is www.selfedge.com .
Andrey
I don't think anyone has suggested English country in this thread. My own advice is well made trousers and shoes as a place to start. I don't think sportscoats or overcoats are either affected or an English exclusive. Then again, I confess not to know what dressing is like in the US these days.Ofcourse, one can always choose the English Country route for weekends but that is often too affected for America and so, it doesn't often work convinclingly.
You bring up a good point. I wear Top Siders a good deal of the summer, but then again I am often on boats. As much as I like them for their intended use, I somehow think they look funny worn in the city or as a normal part of dress. This is to your point of wearing clothes well or "properly."There is nothing wrong with classic American casual wear including Chinos, polos, Top Siders, jeans, Ts, OCBD, etc. They are classic for a reason but just need to be chosen and worn properly.
I agree. There is nothing wrong with chinos and jeans. I prefer polos to t-shirts, but as they other poster noted, I'm a tennis player and so I think they can be really good.Anonymous wrote:There is nothing wrong with classic American casual wear including Chinos, polos, Top Siders, jeans, Ts, OCBD, etc. They are classic for a reason but just need to be chosen and worn properly.
The polo is ubiquitous in the US and if you did away with it, that would be akin to banishing a classic here.Men simply look better in collared shirts. I would ask anyone but a tennis player to stay away from the dreadful polo shirt with advertisements and logos like faux polo players, turtles, or doo dads.. If one feels uncomfortable in a collared shirt, wear a plain T shirt. One recognizes the American in Paris a mile off by his florescent white jogging shoes and polo shirt.
The polo shirt only became popular in the US in the late 1970s with the arrival of the “preppy” fad and Ralph Lauren. The polo is an invention of polo players in Argentina. The look migrated to Europe and then later to the States. I do not think we are talking about an indigenous American classic either in terms of the origins of the style or the rather recent time frame of its popularity. I seem to remember Americans largely wearing collared, button down shirts in the 60s.The polo is ubiquitous in the US and if you did away with it, that would be akin to banishing a classic here. Indeed, the nifty American can be spotted a mile down the road overseas. But then again each country also has its styling cues, for better or for worse, which signal its people's origins.
Jeans, on the other hand, are an American classic as their origins are with Levis Strauss of California. Did you really want to say “dominate the world?And I'll add jeans because they dominate the world and are very much American wear.
I think you’ll find, and the posts by Etutee are helpful, that American style was greatly influenced by English and Continental fashions throughout most of the last century, at least up until the mid 1970s.American casual style at its best is is pleasant, straightforward, functional, comfortable and rewarding. The many illustrations from Etutee's post I presume are of Americans at leisure and the casual clothing is by and large very direct and uncomplicated. And very successful.
Would you feel better if he removed the Harris tweed coat (America is still the largest market in the world for Harris tweed so someone must be wearing it)? If he removed the coat, cap and scarf and wore a button down shirt or a polo sans logo, I think most of us would agree, he would be considered well dressed anywhere in the world. The trousers are beautifully cut and the suede shoes are handsome. Are you saying that a lounge coat in tweed is too flamboyant? Is wearing a scarf or carrying an umbrella too chic?Now if I may take ,with permission , a photo of a very elegant man for illustration, I would suggest that this gentleman is beautifully dressed with all of the right cues and signals which we have come to consider designate a sophisticated dresser.
The weekend slob needn't go to the sartorial lengths of our friend in the photo above nor what I'll call Lord of the Manor English Country. Both styles will feel alien in the broad streets of America.
The pictures of our friend do represent works of a sartoria, a bespoke tailor, and therefore can be referred to as “sartorial.” Are you referring to the use of “local” bespoke tailors by the educated sartorialist? If you are referring to the use of locally made RTW garments, then you might want to use another term such as “educated dresser.” The word “sartorial” has a specific meaning, it relates exclusively to products of a sartoria.Buy local and wear it like an educated sartorialist.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests